The Daily Star

Your Right To Know
Thursday, February 11, 2016

Saturday, December 10, 2011
Front Page

Rising High flouting rules

Rajuk guilty of violating its own regulations; Gulshan braces for huge traffic mess as 25-storey Doreen Tower readies for opening

At Gulshan-2 intersection, Doreen Tower stands flouting all rules and regulations. Even though buildings are not permitted to rise beyond 150 feet in the area, Doreen stands over 300 feet tall. Its car park can accommodate around 40 cars, whereas the rules stipulate that it have parking arrangements for at least 140. The tower also does not have the mandatory open space around it or the fire safety facilities required. The owners claim that they want to arrange parking space in a nearby building, right, but that too goes against the rules.Photo: STAR

The 25-storey Doreen Tower in the capital's Gulshan has been built without height clearance, a required car park and vital fire safety facilities, with Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha (Rajuk) playing an inexplicable role.

The high rise at Gulshan-2 roundabout will worsen the traffic chaos in an already crammed commercial area. The extremely limited car park of the building will mean that vehicles belonging to its tenants and visitors will be parked on the street, occupying much of the space there, clogging the traffic in all directions as the Doreen Tower is on the main intersection.

Traffic in the whole area already faces severe congestion, sometimes for hours.

Under the terms of the Building Construction Rules of 1996, any building 10 storeys or higher must keep open space as follows: 10 feet at the back, 8.4 feet on the two sides and five feet in the front.

But, as this correspondent found during a recent visit to the site, the owner of the Doreen Tower has left no open space. As per records, the total land area of the plot is 6,051 square feet while the built-up floor area is 6,052 square feet.

ASM Ismail, the chief government architect, said under the 1996 rules such a tall building could in no way be approved in Gulshan area.

"Leaving no setback [open space] is a gross violation of rules," said Ismail, who previously served at Rajuk as an authorised officer for building approval.

Survey of Bangladesh, the national surveying and mapping agency, in a report two years ago listed Doreen Tower as one of the "highly risky" buildings for air operations. Its height is more than double the permissible 150 feet.

The taller a building is, more stringent is the compliance with the fire safety, set back rule, height restriction and car park space.

Consequences of such deviations in case of a 25-storey building are many times more hazardous than what it is in case of a six-storey building.

Rajuk, the authority responsible for overseeing development and controlling construction in the city, approved the plan in January 1998 though Doreen Tower did not have the required open space and the height clearance and fire department clearance, all of which are mandatory for such high-rise constructions.

As per the building law, Rajuk must ensure that developers comply with those mandatory prerequisites.

Completed last year, Doreen Tower is set to open for commercial use soon, company officials have said.

All through the decade in which the building came up, Rajuk inexplicably looked the other way as such gross violations of construction rules occurred.

Rajuk Chairman Nurul Huda told The Daily Star last month that he would initiate an investigation into how the approval of the tower plan went through.

Asked why Rajuk had not addressed these concerns while the construction was going on, he said, "I cannot say that without going through the files." He then left for Hajj.

Doreen Tower has parking arrangements for some 40 vehicles in its basement against parking requirement for nearly 140 vehicles.

As per rules, a commercial building like Doreen Tower must provide for a 248-square-foot car park for every 2,153-square-foot floor space.

The building lacks fire-protected emergency dedicated escape route, including staircase, fire fighting lift and fire-protected shelter space to facilitate safe exit in the event of an emergency. This is mandatory under the National Building Code.

The owner obtained a provisional clearance from the fire service department last year, while fittings of basic fire safety features like alarm bells, sprinklers, fire extinguishers and hose reels are still going on.

Fire service laws say any building above six storeys must obtain prior clearance from the fire department and fire fighting system should be installed at the time of construction.

On giving clearance after completion of the construction, Zohurul Amin Mian, assistant director of Fire Service and Civil Defence, said they did so thinking that the building was under construction.

Contacted for comments, Tanzeer Alam Siddique, managing director of Doreen Tower, responded to this paper's queries on November 1.

He said Rajuk had approved the plan the way it had been submitted.

"It was Rajuk's duty to ensure if the rules were being followed, said Tanzeer, son of Noor-e-Alam Siddique, the building owner.

Noor-e-Alam is a former student leader and politician. He avoided answering the question why a plan, blatantly violating set back rules and height restrictions, was submitted to Rajuk in the first place.

On not keeping the required room for parking, Tanzeer Alam said the traffic situation had not been as bad a decade ago, when construction of the building began, as it is today. When pointed out that specific rules about parking were in existence then, he remained silent.

Tanzeer, however, said the shortcoming would be "compensated" by arranging a car park in another building, which is about 500 yards away from Doreen Tower. Rules do not permit such an arrangement.

The "so called other building" is a six-storey commercial structure with a narrow entry surrounded by residential plots. Much of its space for 64 car parks is required for its own tenants.

While his brother Tahzeeb Alam Siddique said the firm would convert one of the two staircases into an emergency exit, Tanzeer claimed it had already been done.

On October 17, four Doreen Tower officials, including a general manager, an electrical engineer and a former Rajuk engineer, sat with this correspondent at the tower to explain their position.

All of them spoke on condition of anonymity.

"The Rajuk officials who approved the plan are responsible for the anomalies," said the ex-Rajuk engineer, who is an adviser of the project.

The general manager said, "We don't know why the owner did not comply with the building rules.

Share on


Just cut the building in half. That is the only way greedy people will follow the law. Hence, less suffering for common people.

: Iftekhar Hassan

Also government need to take firm action against Rajuk crooks. Rajuk is full of corrupt people like they had over at Titas gas.

: Iftekhar Hassan


  • Manzoor Ashraf
    Saturday, December 10, 2011 12:21 AM GMT+06:00 (218 weeks ago)

    Dhaka needs more high rise building but it is a real shame that its owners have broken many safety rules!

  • Nasirullah Mridha,USA
    Saturday, December 10, 2011 02:18 AM GMT+06:00 (218 weeks ago)

    In the very eye of RAJUK we saw BGMEA was throw up the giant building,there are thousands of unauthrised building suffused in the city.Without RAJUK officials tepid consent this building carved out we don't want to believe it.Politicians sons didn't utilized his fathers upper hand in administration to violate the rule of building code is pinches of salt.Rajuk Chairman indifferent action should cogitate as 'derelicton of duty'.

  • Rrm
    Saturday, December 10, 2011 02:41 AM GMT+06:00 (218 weeks ago)

    Why is the current government allowing this construction? The answer is obvius:$$$$$$$

  • AH
    Saturday, December 10, 2011 03:06 AM GMT+06:00 (218 weeks ago)

    Educated men are the liability of Bangladesh. They are virtual muggers and extortionists. They are anti-national in the true sense. We illiterate people badly need a high voltage mass upsurge to chase after, catch and show these culprits(anti-nationals) the doors. Nothing exists more powerful than a state. Any way we have made laws or rules for our survival and have to hold esteem and follow these for our survival.

  • Dilruba
    Saturday, December 10, 2011 05:38 AM GMT+06:00 (218 weeks ago)

    Just pull it down, the way the Rangs Tower was pulled down.

  • Robin
    Saturday, December 10, 2011 06:20 AM GMT+06:00 (218 weeks ago)

    Visiting Bangladesh after 15 years. Dhaka city has become a mega dump. Completely unfit for a civilized living.

  • Raihan Sharif
    Saturday, December 10, 2011 10:16 AM GMT+06:00 (218 weeks ago)

    And if one asks the Rajuk chairman, he will mumble some tired cliches and then walk off. Lack of accountability and influence peddling by AL party men guarantees that these structures will continue to be built.

  • Anonymous
    Saturday, December 10, 2011 11:01 AM GMT+06:00 (218 weeks ago)

    Bangladesh is a small landmass. We obviously need more high rises; however, all the standards have to be met first!

  • Anonymous
    Saturday, December 10, 2011 10:54 AM GMT+06:00 (218 weeks ago)

    Doreen, Jabbar, Premier Bank's tower in Gulshan are all owned by AL and its allies. So no action cannot be taken against them as they are untouchable. These are only the few examples of good governance by Hasina and her govt. God willing, If there is a govt like Fakruddin Ahmed ever comes to power, then only these buildings will be demolished. Until that day comes, we all can sit back and relax.

  • Saturday, December 10, 2011 11:02 AM GMT+06:00 (218 weeks ago)

    Extortionists should be brutally executed.

  • Reaz Hassan
    Saturday, December 10, 2011 11:13 AM GMT+06:00 (218 weeks ago)

    The Supreme Court had earlier issued many suo moto rules on public interest. I sincerely hope that they would do the same in this case, and uphold the rule of law in the country. I know the silent majority who dare not speak against powerful political beings, are looking forward to SC intervention to dispense justice in such focused errant cases.

  • Iftikhar Alam
    Saturday, December 10, 2011 12:31 PM GMT+06:00 (218 weeks ago)

    Mr AH: Please do not blame Education as a whole! What kind of education you are talking about? Our education system is broken! This system can produce only sub-standard products, many of them are now the leaders of the society. Please remember, 'Education and culture' is not the same. Just one generation of education is not enough to change the basic mentality. It needs couple of generations to come-up with a well defined family culture and tradition. With due respect I would like to ask one question: 'Who goes for a teaching profession?' If someone does not get a government job, or multinational/ corporate job, opts for second/third/ or ultimate choice : A TEACHING JOB. If the back-benchers become teachers what you can expect from their students?

  • M
    Saturday, December 10, 2011 05:53 AM GMT+06:00 (218 weeks ago)

    A former student leader and politician owning a sky scrapper in Dhaka? I hope he is invited to give lecture on how to make a fortune by the Universities of the country! This would be a great service to the unemployed youth of Bangladesh.

  • Abdul Patwary
    Saturday, December 10, 2011 11:44 AM GMT+06:00 (218 weeks ago)

    Mr Noor-e-Alam Siddiqui is one name and face very few in Bangladesh should be unfamiliar with. He is such an orator whose content and delivery is so captivating. You come across him now and then on talk shows. Like in 1975 during the conversion into BAKSHAL he still continue to speak of lofty ideals of justice etc. One is against to find what really is hidden behind.the speeches. When money comes into the scene everything flies out through the window. Once again we have proved how weak we can be when self interest is involved. We now wait to see how the parties concerned will behave. Will Mr Siddiqui make amends? Will the law of the land me made effective by those concerned. That is hard to believe. Some will probably pocket some good money and things will be as usual. It is an enigma the demolition of Rangs Bhaban. Shall we see the same this time too.

  • Anonymous
    Saturday, December 10, 2011 12:30 PM GMT+06:00 (218 weeks ago)

    Please do not blame Education as a whole! What kind of education you are talking about? Our education system is broken! This system can produce only sub standard products, many of them are now the leaders of the society. Please remember, Education and culture is not the same. Just one generation of education is not enough to change the basic mentality. It needs couple of generations to come-up with a well defined family culture and tradition. With due respect I would like to ask one question: Who goes for a teaching profession? If some someone does not get a government job, or multinational/ corporate job, opts for second/third/ or ultimate choice : A TEACHING JOB. If the backbenchers become teachers what you can expect from their students?

  • shuaib
    Saturday, December 10, 2011 01:36 PM GMT+06:00 (218 weeks ago)

    People want to know what action is going to be taken on the owner or say we want to know whether the owner will get punished or not and that is more important than just letting us know what kind of crimes are happening in the city.

  • masum
    Saturday, December 10, 2011 03:20 PM GMT+06:00 (218 weeks ago)

    I am glad for reporting against missing Rajuk building rule. I hope The Daily Star active report will take act against any missing activities.





The Daily Star

©, 1991-2016. All Rights Reserved