The Daily Star

Your Right To Know
Thursday, February 11, 2016

Friday, December 7, 2012
Front Page

Tribunal chief's net talks, mail hacked

The Economist possesses his personal correspondences, notice issued on the British magazine

The email and Skype accounts of the International Crimes Tribunal-1 chairman have been hacked. The Economist has in its possession the correspondence between the tribunal chief and a Brussels-based legal expert.

Justice Md Nizamul Huq, chief of one of the two tribunals formed to try those who committed crimes against humanity in 1971, yesterday said he came to know of this alarming developments two or three days ago.

Then on Wednesday night, he received a phone call. The person on the other side claimed the call was from the London-based weekly and the paper possessed the record of his Skype conversation with International Criminal Law expert Dr Ahmed Ziauddin.

At one stage of closing arguments by defence counsel of Delawar Hossain Sayedee yesterday, the chairman said he had occasionally discussed with Dr Ahmed, a Bangladeshi living in Brussels, the developments on International Criminal Law.

The tribunal yesterday served a notice on two journalists of The Economist -- Chief Editor Rob Gifford and South Asia Bureau Chief Adam Roberts.

It asked the duo to reply within three weeks why proceedings under 11(4) of International Crimes (Tribunals) Act, 1973 shall not be taken against them.

The tribunal asked The Economist to keep secret the information which it had gathered from the chairman's Skype and email accounts. Otherwise, proper action will be taken.

The court also ordered sending copies of the directives to the inspector general of police and the chairman of Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission for necessary action.

Issuing the order, Justice Nizamul said the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act, 1973 is a new law. To understand the law, it is necessary for the judges to look into the process and orders of different tribunals and consult experts.

He has had privileges of consulting expatriate Bangladeshis, including Dr Ahmed.

“Yesterday [Wednesday] at about 10:00pm, the chairman received a telephone call from +919810016662 [Indian number],” the order read.

The person on the phone said the call was from The Economist and “the conversation between the chairman and Dr Ahmed Ziauddin is in their possession”.

“The caller also asked the chairman some questions regarding this information,” the order read.

“By questioning him over the telephone, the person on the other side has also involved himself in speaking with the chairman.” This is not allowed under the law, it added.

Justice Nizamul mentioned the email and Skype accounts of Dr Ahmed had also been hacked and all the materials he had received from the expert were also in the paper's possession.

Terming it “a serious breach of privacy”, he said the persons involved in disturbing the ongoing processes of the tribunal have links to the hacking.

Breach of privacy through hacking in the pursuit of stories has been discussed around the globe, especially in the United Kingdom, for the last two years.

Last year, the UK launched an inquiry, headed by Lord Justice Leveson, into the culture, practices and ethics of the British press following the News International phone hacking scandal.

The scandal, which has led to the closure of the News of the World, halted Media tycoon Rupert Murdoch's BSkyB takeover bid, and prompted the arrest of several key figures.

Share on


Well, it is more plausible that the Jamaat Islami hackers did it. Why would Economist say they hacked it? That would be quite dumb of an action.

: rch

The justice will be served on war criminals and people have all the support for the tribunals. Fail to punish the criminals will leave a big whole of country's morality.

: Rfk


  • Mohmmad Zainal Abedin, NY, USA
    Friday, December 7, 2012 05:44 AM GMT+06:00 (166 weeks ago)

    Justice Nizamul Huq should immediately resign, as he proved himself unfit for the job. Justice Nimaul Huq acknowledged that he used to take help from Dr Ahmed Ziauddiin. Such acknowledgement uncovers his weakness. So, he has no moral right to remain in his post.

  • Jumana Sarwar
    Friday, December 7, 2012 06:42 AM GMT+06:00 (166 weeks ago)

    The judges by all means should work hard to make sure they have minimum public contact and restrict themselves to limited social gathering. This principle is followed in order to remain free from outside influence on cases where they are acting as judges. If they need professional advice they can seek those following standard protocol so that their visibility outside their private life keep on transparent. However using internet secretly to seek advice from a private citizen, the ICT-1 judge broke the protocol and make the whole trial exercise the subject of controversy. The judge knows very well, the Economist will not pay any attention to his ruling but he can attempt to sideline the main issue attacking the messenger instead of the message.

  • Sadik Sardar
    Friday, December 7, 2012 07:30 AM GMT+06:00 (166 weeks ago)

    It does not matter who the accused is, either some from Jamaat or BNP or Awami League. Everybody has red blood, love, emotion and death. When anybody is killed we get shocked but when somebody is killed unfairly and unjustly, we cry for him or her with more shock. Which party you belong is irrelevant? Take preparation to meet this type of justice unless you stop it.





The Daily Star

©, 1991-2016. All Rights Reserved