The Daily Star

Your Right To Know
Monday, April 20, 2015

Monday, February 11, 2013
Front Page

Change law to try Jamaat

Demand gets louder as govt sits today on amending war crimes trial act

The government tables today a proposal for amending the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act-1973 to provide for appeal against inadequate sentence in war crimes cases.

Finalised yesterday, the proposal also envisages hearing and disposal of an appeal within 60 days from the date of its filing with the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court.

There is no mention of time limit in the law for disposing of the appeal in the cases involving the crimes against humanity committed during the Liberation War in 1971.

Interpreting the proposed amendment, Law Minister Shafique Ahmed told The Daily Star yesterday that the Appellate Division will dispose of an appeal within 45 days from the date of its filing. If the apex court still cannot complete the disposal, it will get another 15 days.

He said any appeal against an ICT verdict has to be filed with the Supreme Court within 30 days from the date of delivery of the verdict as per the existing provision.

Earlier in the day, Shafique Ahmed told reporters at his office in Bangladesh Secretariat that a bill will be placed before parliament within a week if the cabinet approves the proposed amendment.

He hoped the House will pass the bill in its current session.

The government, any aggrieved person or victim can file appeal against inadequate sentence or acquittal order given by the tribunal to any accused, as per the proposed amendment.

Replying to a question, the minister said as per the proposed amendment, the government can file an appeal with the SC against the ICT-2 verdict that awarded Jamaat-e Islami leader Abdul Quader Mollah life term.

The amendment will be given retrospective effect from September 25 last year.

Eminent writer and journalist Shahriar Kabir told The Daily Star that a provision has to be included in the ICT law for trying Jamaat-e-Islami that led the heinous crimes like genocide, killings, rapes, lootings and arsons during the war.

If the party is not tried and punished, the present government will face serious danger, he said.

The noted campaigner added that seven political parties including Nazi party were tried and punished in the Nuremberg trial as war criminal organisations and their properties were confiscated.

The International Crimes Tribunal-2 verdict, which awarded life term imprisonment to Jamaat leader Quader Mollah without giving any directive about his future politics, is not acceptable at all, he said.

“We want death sentence for Quader Mollah,” he said, adding that the properties of Jamaat-e Islami have to be confiscated.

A prominent jurist requesting anonymity told The Daily Star that as per the constitution's article 47 (3), there is no bar to trying the political organisations under which the crimes were committed during the Liberation War.

Asked about the trial of the political parties, Law Minister Shafique Ahmed told The Daily Star yesterday he might discuss the issue during today's cabinet meeting.

Before finalising the proposal for amending the ICT law, Shafique along with State Minister for Law Qamrul Islam held a meeting with some legal experts at his office yesterday.

The experts included former High Court judges Justice Syed Amirul Islam, Justice Zaki Ebadul Huq, Justice Khademul Islam Chowdhury and Justice MA Rashid, Law Commission acting chairman Prof Shah Alam, National Human Rights Commission Chairman Prof Mizanur Rahman, Attorney General Mahbubey Alam and Additional Attorney General MK Rahman.

The original law of 1973 had no provision for the government to appeal against any verdict in war crimes cases.

In 2009, the law was amended to give the government the right to appeal to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court against a war crimes verdict in the event of “an order of acquittal”.

But the government, which represents the victims in the crimes against humanity cases, did not have the right to appeal against an inadequate sentence.

The defence, however, enjoys the right to appeal against any “conviction and sentence” in both the original and the amended law.

This difference in the rights to appeal has come to the fore following the verdict in Quader Mollah's case on February 5.

Hours after the verdict was delivered, people from all walks of life started non-stop demonstrations at Shahbagh intersection, demanding death penalty to Mollah.

The law minister said the decision to amend the law has been taken to fulfil the expectations of people, he said, adding that amending the laws is a continuous process.

The government has taken steps to amend the ICT act to ensure equal right of the government, aggrieved persons and victims and the accused, he added.

Share on



 





Of course their wealth needs to be confiscated and their industries need to be taken up and given to the victims of 1971.

: Talat Islam

Youths are the last resource for a country to save it from conspirators and traitors like Jaamat and their allies who tell all the lies and mislead the country even taking the sacred Quran in their hands. Islam as a religion is being hijacked by these killers.

: naabaj

Comments

  • S.Rahman
    Monday, February 11, 2013 06:50 AM GMT+06:00 (114 weeks ago)

    The exclusion of the government to appeal cases was done to prevent their interference of verdicts. Due to the intervention of either an AL or BNP led government that might arise from political influence, the right to appeal was limited in the Tribunals Act.

    In essence, due to the AL-BNP battle over the past 35 years, the nation did not want any meddling by any political parties that would motivate the judiciary system and its Justices. The current AL led government that re-instated the Act, should have thought through this possible loophole that favors the accused or defense council's appeal rights. The only solution is to amend the Act again, but only going forward with current trials. The case of Mollah needs to be closed as quickly as possible as per the current Act- government can appeal charge No.4 with the Supreme Court.

  • S K
    Monday, February 11, 2013 03:05 PM GMT+06:00 (114 weeks ago)

    Definitely it is a very good move by the Govt to amend the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act 1973. I also agree with Mr. Shahriar Kabir that a provision should also be included in the ICT Act for trying Jamaat-e-Islami that that committed crimes against humanity including killing, rape, arson, looting, etc. in 1971.

  • Barkat
    Monday, February 11, 2013 04:13 PM GMT+06:00 (114 weeks ago)

    Why Only Jamaat? Any party and any organisation that are looting the wealth of people of Bangladesh should be banned. AL has looted Bangladesh in last four years from share market, Hall Mark, Padma Bridge to Railway scandal. Why no leader of AL is held responsible for these crimes and not a single leader is prosecuted. The entire nation witness the crime of AL and its goons in forms of killings in street and universities. How come the AL is spared and others should be banned.

  • Litton
    Monday, February 11, 2013 04:19 PM GMT+06:00 (114 weeks ago)

    Government enacts laws in order to protect the interests of its people, to safeguard their lives and give them a place where peace and harmony abides. Any law that doesn't give these fundamental rights to people but rather makes it hard on them should be amended. The representatives of the people at the house should wholeheartedly support it.

  • Nasir
    Monday, February 11, 2013 05:26 PM GMT+06:00 (114 weeks ago)

    The Awami league is an extension of Indian policies in Bangladesh.

    A fair trial should be given.


 

 


advertisement

 


The Daily Star

© thedailystar.net, 1991-2015. All Rights Reserved