The government seems to have taken a negative approach towards some NGOs, civil society initiatives and alternative political forces. But obviously the attitude is not compatible with our democratic and constitutional traditions. Looking unkindly on an alternative political forum or depriving the civil society from performing their duties or ignoring them, as we have witnessed in recent times, can only smack of majoritarian arrogance. In other countries, the civil society plays a big advisory role, they are often called the second track of the government itself. That is because they are able to provide an impartial outlook on a lot of things.

Accusations have been hurled by the government at some NGOs in the country, but none of the allegations have been substantiated as yet. If there is anything against an NGO, it cannot be a matter of subjective claim; it has to be proven beyond any shadow of doubt. NGOs with their commendable contributions in poverty alleviation must be allowed to continue their programmes without any hindrance. In this regard, the recent attempt by the government in producing a draft law to restrict the activities of NGOs has been criticised. Donors have categorically said that NGOs should be allowed to operate freely without any political interference and inappropriate restrictions imposed by the government. They have a point that merits active consideration.