|  | <%-- Page Title--%>
<%-- Navigation Bar--%>
<%-- Navigation Bar--%> |  |   
  
        Your Advocate
 
 This week your 
        advocate is M. Moazzam Husain of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh. His 
        professional interests include civil law, criminal law and constitutional 
        law. Send your queries to the Law Desk, The Daily Star. A panel of lawyers 
        will address your problems.
 Q: 
        I would like some clarification on the Law of Inheritance under the Muslim 
        Law in Bangladesh: (1) If a male Muslim has left behind property in his 
        name, how will it be inherited by his wife and children (i) if there are 
        sons and daughters (ii) if there are only daughters? Can there be other 
        legal heirs of this property? (2) If a female Muslim has left behind property 
        in her name, how will it be inherited by her husband and children (i) 
        if there are sons and daughters (ii) if there are only daughters? Can 
        there be other legal heirs of this property? Does the situation differ 
        for the husband if the subject property was gifted to the wife by the 
        husband in the first place? (3) If a Muslim husband has gifted property 
        to his wife, can he legally cancel or claim back the gift (i) under any 
        circumstances (ii) under compelling circumstances, ie. divorce or separation, 
        death of wife? (4) Is a Will legally valid for property and cash wealth 
        in Bangladesh? (5) Is the Nominee system (bank accounts, savings certificates, 
        company or government pension and provident funds etc) legally valid, 
        i.e. cannot be contested in court by legal heirs?Z.A. Khan
 67 Gulshan North Avenue,
 Dhaka 1212.
 Your 
        Advocate: Most of your questions are on the Muslim- inheritance. 
        Let me address them accordingly (1)(i) Under Muslim law between brothers 
        and sisters the ratio is 2:1 that is, brother taking double the share 
        of the sister. ii) ½, if there is only one daughter and 2/3 if there are more. Yes, the nature 
        of the share indicates that others have entitlement to the property. Rest 
        of the property will go to the residuary, i.e., brother, father, grand 
        father, uncle, brother's sons etc. how high or low so ever. (2) Between 
        sons and daughters only the ratio always is 2:1. Yes, the rest of the 
        property will go to the residuary as in the case of a male. Yes, if the 
        property is already gifted to the wife or any one else the gifted portion 
        will be excluded from distribution. (3) Under no circumstances if the 
        gift is complete. (4) Yes, will apply to cash as well as the landed property. 
        (5) Opinion may differ. But my considered view is that the system of showing 
        a nominee in the circumstances as you have mentioned is more a rule of 
        convenience than of law relating to title. Somebody, suppose a son, is 
        made nominee generally for the purpose of convenient disposal of the account 
        or dealing with other interests lying with the Govt., Companies etc. in 
        absence of the public servant, account holder/ owner as the case may be. 
        It can not be construed to mean that the original claimant by that way 
        contemplated deprivation of all his other heirs on his/her death. Therefore, 
        such attempt, if taken, by the nominee is open to challenge in any appropriate 
        court of law if there is nothing for the nominee to show that the original 
        claimant intended the nominee to be sole beneficiary of his claim.
    |