Home | Back Issues | Contact Us | News Home
 
 
“All Citizens are Equal before Law and are Entitled to Equal Protection of Law”-Article 27 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh



Issue No: 176
February 6, 2005

This week's issue:
Law Campaign
Law Reform
Human Rights Monitor
Rights Monitor
Law Opinion
HUman Rights Advocacy
LAW Week

Back Issues

Law Home

News Home


 

 

Law opinion

Becoming a lawyer

Setting a lucrative goal of becoming a lawyer is not possible for all. A lawyer is jurist forever and it is a continuous process. Lawyer called as learned in the society but surprisingly a lot of lawyers, specially who are practising in the subordinate court like me, are not competent enough to become the gladiator of establishing law in the society. Being social engineer a major portion of the lawyers is misguiding the clients as well as the courts in raw hands that is one of the causes of delaying of speedy disposal of justice. There are more than five thousands lawyers are practising in Dhaka Court but you will get only few competent and efficient trial lawyers. Among the all sorts of practising law, trial advocacy is tough job and the lawyer community must accept it. "Lawyering is an art and it can not be availed within short span of time"-this is a wise saying of the learned senior lawyer of our community. But in present context the witty lawyers of the modern world say that lawyering is an art and it must be taught by adequate training and I do believe that young lawyers should get proper opportunity through training to competent for transitional practice of law. Bangladesh need some articulate lawyers for the sake of democracy, rule of law and above all establishing law in the society. It is true that Bangladesh Bar Council has taken pioneer and vital steps to produce visionary and competent lawyers for the next generation providing few courses like Bar Vocational Course (BVC) and Intensive Trial Advocacy course, organised by Legal Education Training Institute. The course duration of the first one is only for six weeks and second one is only one week that are not sufficient at all and there is no Appellate Advocacy Training in Bangladesh. To learn about appellate advocacy young lawyers are to depend on the learned senior lawyers. In fact the competent, eminent and witty lawyers are too busy that they don't have adequate time to teach the young lawyers. But they should bear in mind that it is there implied obligation to this profession is to make astute lawyers and adroit justices for this century. Completing the BVC-Batch-8, I should be grateful to LETI but I have few suggestions to Bangladesh Bar Council and our learned senior lawyers to fit the young lawyers to uphold the dignity of the lawyering profession that are given below:

1.An Appellate Advocacy Training Program should be started as soon as possible.
2.Third class in any public examination should be treated as a disqualification of becoming a lawyer.
3.Bar Vocational Course may be started after passing advocacy written examination and advocacy viva voce may be held after completion of BVC.

Mohammed Mamun Al Feruje LL.M(D.U) Advocate Dhaka Judge Court.


Conflict between fundamental rights and fundamental principle of state policy

Fundamental rights and fundamental principle of state policy are the most essential ingredients of our constitution. Both of them serve a useful purpose to reach to the goal of economic democracy but complexity arises when these two take position face to face. There is a common notion among the general people and even among some of the scholars that in case of conflict between fundamental rights and fundamental principle of state policy fundamental right will prevail. Actually, this is totally a wrong idea. This concept was actually established in India by the prominent case of Madras v Dorairajan but we are not bound by the decision of the court of India ,therefore, the situation is different in Bangladesh. Actually, the framers of the constitution of Bangladesh were really conscious about the possible conflict between the provision of Part iii and the principle of state policy. They predicted that the welfare measure of the state may be barred by the provision of part iii of the constitution and therefore they specially provided in the article 47 that in specified matters any law made shall be immune from the challenge on the ground of inconsistency with part iii if the parliament declares such law has been made to give affect to any of the fundamental principle of state policy. In other words parliament has ability to make fundamental right subordinate to the fundamental principle in certain cases mentioned in article 47 in our constitution. Hence,one should not ignore the principle of state policy , but should adopt the principle of harmonious construction and attempt to give effect to both of them.

Putul, 2nd year Dept of Law, Dhaka University.

 

 

 
 
 


© All Rights Reserved
thedailystar.net