Food
For Thought Learning
from the Past
Farah Ghuznavi
Politicians
are fond of saying that history will judge them (invariably
while arguing a point of view that others don't share). Sometimes,
in the midst of events that are taking place, it is indeed
hard to gauge the long-term implications of such decisions.
For example, some who believed in Weapons of Mass Destruction
(WMD) were genuinely dismayed when this argument was subsequently
discredited.
However,
though events can be judged more objectively from a historical
perspective, facts are needed in order to do so accurately.
The bitterness over the Iraq war is not only about the non-existence
of WMD, but also relates to the suspicion that political leaders
have not always been honest e.g. the UK Attorney-General's
full legal advice to the government was not officially made
public until it had been leaked (which was also when some
Cabinet Ministers saw it for the first time!), and confirms
that the legality of the war remained questionable. Meanwhile,
the "irrefutable intelligence" --(clearly, anything
but!) -- in the US war-dossier drew some of its material from
a decade-old PhD thesis available on the Internet…
Even when
situations are correctly documented, revisionist historians
and opportunistic politicians may collaborate to promote denial,
as Bangladesh has experienced first-hand. Despite worldwide
recognition of the 1971 genocide, we have to date received
no reparations and no formal apology for the enormous human
suffering caused. Rather, there has been a frequent re-writing
of history where the Liberation War is portrayed either as
a valiant battle by Pakistan to hold together a Muslim homeland,
or a war between India and Pakistan, in which the freedom
fighters and martyrs of Bangladesh are forgotten altogether!
Nor is
Bangladesh alone in experiencing this, as recent events in
China and South Korea have shown. After initially treating
their outrage over revisionist Japanese history texts (that
downplayed the damage done to these countries by Japan) as
a minor diplomatic incident, the Japanese premier finally
expressed "deep remorse" and "heartfelt apologies"
for Japan's colonial rampage through Asia, which caused millions
of deaths. However, the sincerity of his apology has been
questioned, because it re-hashes a 1995 statement by the (then)
Socialist Prime Minister, rather than offering anything new.
Furthermore, the current Japanese Education Minister is among
the (over 100) ruling party supporters of the neo-nationalist
group responsible for these textbooks. That group believes
that the 1995 apology went too far, and adding insult to injury
-- claims that the so-called "comfort women" (100,000-200,000
sex slaves kept by the Imperial Japanese Army) were simply
"prostitutes"!
Indeed,
it has become quite clear that the primary reason behind Japan's
verbal retreat on this issue relates to China's importance
as a trading partner, and Japan's current aspirations to a
permanent seat on the UN Security Council, rather than because
of any genuine penitence.
Meanwhile,
the uproar over the Japanese textbooks has led historians
in the UK to demand a re-evaluation of the way that Britain's
imperial past is taught, with experts warning against whitewashing
unsavoury aspects of the colonial experience. Currently, the
curriculum is structured to encourage students to focus on
World War II (e.g., the rise of Hitler), rather than focusing
on events like the Boer war in South Africa (when 27,000 women
and children died in Lord Kitchener's concentration camps),
or the Mau Mau insurgency in Kenya (which was brutally put
down by the colonial authorities).
This is
undoubtedly a praiseworthy initiative, since the failures
to learn from history are clear. Despite the global community's
promises to "never again" allow crimes against humanity
to take place unchecked (recently reiterated at the 10th anniversary
of the Rwandan genocide), events in Darfur have already raised
questions about the veracity of such pledges. And while many
view the Nazi era as the darkest chapter in European history,
the recent Balkans conflicts demonstrate that "ethnic
cleansing" policies continue decades later.
Of all
nations, perhaps Israel could be expected to have learnt the
most from history. Jews have experienced persecution not only
during the appalling atrocities of WW II, but for centuries
before that. Sadly, what many appear to have learnt from their
own undoubted suffering is not greater sensitivity to the
sufferings of others. On the contrary, they seem determined
to dwell obsessively on their own grievances.
While
fully acknowledging that Israel is correct in its assessment
of its (lack of) popularity in the region, it seems absurd
that a recognised nuclear weapons state -- which also happens
to be the best friend of the world's only superpower! -- should
seek to portray itself as the vulnerable party in the Middle
Eastern powder-keg. Instead of learning from history how not
to behave, Israel regularly tramples on the rights of others
on a pre-emptive basis, while emphasising its own "victim
status".
So perhaps
then, the nation that really appears to have learnt the lessons
of history is Germany, which remains to date, one of the largest
donors to Israel. Many see this as ongoing reparations for
the Holocaust. So why does Germany do this? Is it because
of some inherent nobility in the German character that they
continue paying the price for their sins? Perhaps -- and one
should certainly give credit to the Germans for not only paying
their reparations (financial and otherwise) uncomplainingly,
but also ensuring that the post-war generation of Germans
have been properly educated about this aspect of their country's
past.
Undoubtedly,
part of the reason why the Nazis' treatment of the Jews remains
so vivid in European memory also has to do with the collective
guilt that many European nations feel about the events of
that period. However, the key reason that the Holocaust is
still a live issue today is because the Jews who survived
those atrocities have ensured that the memory of those who
didn't is kept in the forefront of global discourse. Whatever
you may think of the state of Israel (and I, for one, am no
fan of Israeli foreign policy!), it is hard not to envy the
tenacity with which all of us, including the Germans, are
regularly reminded of Nazi atrocities through the countless
books, films and history syllabuses that focus on that period.
Nations,
like individuals, mature and develop over time. Ideally, their
development takes place in a progressive rather than regressive
direction (though given some of the recent debates around
immigration and asylum in Europe, one might be forgiven for
questioning whether this is actually happening). Perhaps the
best guarantee of balanced development is to ensure that the
lessons of history are learnt well, and remembered with clarity.
The historical progression should be a positive one --recognising,
learning and building on the experiences of the past -- both
good and bad. If that happens, then there is hope for all
of us to overcome the past. Post-war Germany's rehabilitation
in the international community is only one example of that.
And bearing
that in mind, it is less the case (as US President Woodrow
Wilson put it) that no nation is fit to pass judgement on
another nation, but rather, that any nation which seeks to
pass judgement on another, must make sure that its own house
is in order first, and that it truly does practice what it
preaches.
Copyright
(R) thedailystar.net 2005 |