Home  -  Back Issues  -  The Team  -  Contact Us
     Volume 4 Issue 6 | July 30, 2004 |


   Letters
   Voicebox
   Chintito
   Cover Story
   News Notes
   Slice of Life
   Musings
   Perceptions
   Sityscape
   Event
   Profile
   Education
   Music
   Special Feature
   Straight Talk
   Jokes
   Reflection
   Trivia
   Time Out
   Sci-Tech
   Books
   Book Review
   Dhaka Diary
   Health
   New Flicks
   Write to Mita

   SWM Home


 

Time Out

A game of mistakes only? Chess

Is chess a game of mistakes only? For the beginner or the average player, that may be true. They usually wait for their opponents to make some horrible blunder and win without having to do anything. That's chess at the wood-pushers' level.

There are many types of mistakes, usually depending on the strength of the players. A wood-pusher hopes for a checkmate overlooked by the opponent. He is happy with the win since he knows that chess is a game of mistakes only. Move a little ahead, and you meet players who do not rely on gross oversights. They miss combinations of three or for moves, but not a knight fork or a mate in one. Moving further along the line, you find the masters who do not usually miss tactical threats. They commit positional mistakes which can be exploited only through patient manoeuvring. Then there is the super-master level where the mistakes are too subtle for lesser mortals like us to understand anything. The inanimate objects called chessmen come to life in the hands of a master. In fact, chess is played at so many levels that at times you may wonder whether they are playing the same game!

But even grandmasters do believe that mistakes, even elementary ones, influence the outcome of a game. I think it was Dr. S Tartakower (1887-1956) who said that the winner of a game is the player who makes the second last mistake. "Mistakes are there, just waiting to be made", was another of his many interesting observations. Try to work out the point of this one -- " Some players don't consider a move strong enough if it is not audible in the next room"!

Tartakower was a poet and linguist and, above all, a very witty man. He never quite rose to the very top, but was a leading player in the 1920's. He was not orthodox (no poet can ever be!). Nevertheless, his new ideas enriched the game in many ways.

Here is a game in which the Ukrainian master gives up a rook like a real gambler and then recovers his money with interest!

White-Geza Maroczy
Black-Saviely Tartakower [A85]
Teplitz-Schoenau 1922

1.d4 e6 2.c4 f5 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.a3 Be7 5.e3 00 6.Bd3 d5 7.Nf3 c6 8.00 Ne4 9.Qc2 Bd6 10.b3 Nd7 11.Bb2 Rf6 12.Rfe1 Rh6 13.g3 Qf6 14.Bf1 g5 15.Rad1 g4 16.Nxe4 fxe4 17.Nd2 Rxh2 18.Kxh2 Qxf2+ 19.Kh1 Nf6 20.Re2 Qxg3 21.Nb1 Nh5 22.Qd2 Bd7 23.Rf2 Qh4+ 24.Kg1 Bg3 25.Bc3 Bxf2+ 26.Qxf2 g3 27.Qg2 Rf8 28.Be1 Rxf1+ 29.Kxf1 e5 30.Kg1 Bg4 31.Bxg3 Nxg3 32.Re1 Nf5 33.Qf2 Qg5 34.dxe5 Bf3+ 35.Kf1 Ng3+ 0-1.

Position after 17...Rh2


-PATZER

 

 

Copyright (R) thedailystar.net 2004